Add Row
Add Element
cropper
update
BuildingConstructionTrade |a CapidHouser.com Media Site
update
Add Element
  • Home
  • Categories
    • roofing
    • loft conversion
    • Residential Buildings
    • office building
    • Plastering Rendering Screeding
    • Windows Glazing Doors
    • building machinery
    • groundworks
    • Building Construction Techniques
    • DIY
  • Scaffolding
  • Skip Hire Waste Removal
  • Home Extensions
  • Building Protective Coatings
  • Garden Rooms
  • Driveways
  • Building & construction marketing
  • featured business profiles
  • Architecture And Design
  • Materials
  • commercial construction
January 26.2026
2 Minutes Read

Understanding 'Relevant Defect' Under the Building Safety Act 2022: What You Need to Know

Intricate scaffolding highlighting construction and architecture law details.

Understanding the Concept of a 'Relevant Defect'

The recent ruling concerning the Building Safety Act 2022 has sparked critical discussions in the construction industry, particularly regarding what constitutes a 'relevant defect.' This term, as outlined under Section 120 of the Act, indicates any defect in a building that leads to a safety risk, such as fire spread or structural failure.

The First Tier Tribunal's decision regarding the Canary Riverside estate clarifies that even minimal risks to safety can define a relevant defect. This departure from traditional interpretations—where only significant risks would qualify—places an obligation on property owners and developers to reevaluate their construction practices in light of current knowledge and standards.

Implications of the Tribunal Decision

In an era when safety regulations are tightening, the tribunal's ruling emphasizes that compliance with historical building regulations isn't sufficient. The focus is now directed towards whether specific defects pose risks based on today's understanding of safety protocols. This finding has broad implications for building construction and renovation projects across London and beyond, requiring stakeholders to adopt a more proactive stance in risk management.

Each building undergoing scrutiny is now being assessed not just for existing compliance but for the inherent risks its design may present, underscoring the importance of rigorous construction practices.

Building Safety: A Collective Responsibility

As building safety becomes a central theme in urban development, various parties, including homeowners, tenants, and construction firms, must engage in open dialogues about safety standards. This collaborative effort is essential not only for protecting lives but also for minimizing legal disputes over liability in scenarios involving remediation orders.

The tribunal decision also serves as a reminder that legal interpretations continue to evolve. Stakeholders must remain informed about these developments to mitigate risks effectively. A failure to do so may expose companies to potential remediation costs and legal challenges.

Next Steps for Construction and Property Professionals

With these developments in mind, all parties involved in building projects, especially construction managers and legal advisors, are urged to reassess their proactive measures. This includes ensuring compliance with the latest regulations and understanding the remediation processes for any identified relevant defects.

As we navigate this changing legal landscape in the realm of Construction Law, it becomes vital to have a competent construction lawyer on hand to address disputes with contractors and navigate complex contractual obligations effectively.

Building & Construction Law

9 Views

0 Comments

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts
01.16.2026

Supreme Court Ruling on Late Payments: A Game-Changer for Construction Law

Update Understanding the Supreme Court Ruling on Late Payments In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court has sided with a late-paying client, Hexagon Housing Association, in a contentious legal dispute with Providence Building Services, a contractor that walked off a site due to frustrations over delayed payments. This ruling underscores a critical lesson for all parties in a construction contract: being the victim of a late payment does not automatically entitle a contractor to terminate the agreement. Key Elements of the Dispute The case revolved around a JCT (Joint Contracts Tribunal) Design and Build Contract, where Providence alleged that Hexagon's delay in payments warranted an immediate contract termination. After 21 instances of late payments, with notable occurrences in December 2022 and May 2023, Providence issued a termination notice. While Providence defended its actions by asserting the contract allowed termination after two late payments, Hexagon contended that the first overdue payment was settled within the contractually amended 28 days. Legal Intricacies and Outcomes The Technology and Construction Court initially ruled in favor of Hexagon, prompting Providence to appeal. The Supreme Court's final judgment on January 15, 2026, confirmed that termination rights are not solely based on late payments but must adhere to the contractual framework outlined in clause 8.9.4. The judges emphasized that permitting a contractor to terminate simply because late payments occurred—even just one day late—would be an extreme measure, and pointed out that serious delays should be more definitive in their consequences. Implications for Construction Professionals This ruling serves as a crucial reminder for contractors and clients alike within the construction industry. The clarity on how late payments are treated within contracts could help avoid similar disputes in the future. As construction professionals review their contracts, an understanding of these legal principles will be paramount in navigating contractual agreements effectively. Advice on Navigating Construction Contractual Issues In light of the decision, it may be beneficial for both contractors and clients to seek legal counsel to ensure that payment terms are clear and adequately safeguard their interests. Engaging a construction lawyer can aid in negotiating contracts and effectively managing disputes.

12.08.2025

FMB's Builder Contract Updates: Essential for Homeowners and Builders Alike

Update FMB’s Updated Contracts: A Game Changer for Builders and Homeowners The Federation of Master Builders (FMB) has taken a significant step forward with the release of revamped builder contract templates, aligning them with the stringent requirements of the Building Safety Act 2022. These contracts aim to simplify the complex legal landscape of construction, making it more accessible for both builders and homeowners. Understanding the Importance of Written Contracts In a sector often fraught with disputes, having a clear contract is not just best practice; it’s essential. Research indicates that many homeowners lack awareness of their legal responsibilities under the new safety regulations. FMB’s Sarah Fox states, "Nobody ever thinks they need a contract—until it’s too late," highlighting the real-world implications of not having an agreement in writing. Contracts now explicitly clarify roles, such as who is responsible for design and construction management, minimizing risks associated with ambiguities in responsibilities. What’s New in FMB’s Contract Templates? The updated FMB contracts stand out due to their brevity—just 14-15 pages compared to the often overwhelming 80+ page documents from other organizations. By focusing on transparency and clarity, these templates enable builders to convey their professionalism effectively, reassuring clients that they operate according to the highest standards. The Role of Builders and Homeowners in Navigating Legalities With many industry professionals hesitant to accept principal design roles due to insurance complications, the new contracts serve as a protective measure for all parties involved. By defining legal responsibilities explicitly, both builders and homeowners can engage in projects with a clearer understanding of accountability, thus nurturing a more cooperative relationship throughout the construction process. Embracing Change and Moving Forward With the evolving landscape of construction law, it’s crucial for builders and homeowners to stay informed about Construction and Architecture Law. The FMB encourages users of these contracts to provide feedback, indicating a collaborative approach to refining these critical tools for the industry. Embracing these contracts could represent a significant shift toward reducing disputes and enhancing the overall quality and safety of construction projects. Homeowners looking to hire builders should not shy away from asking questions regarding these contracts, as they are designed to facilitate understanding and protect both parties. Utilizing FMB’s contracts may not only safeguard interests but also elevate trust in the hiring process.

10.23.2025

Groundbreaking Supreme Court Ruling Could Revive Housing Development Under Nutrient Neutrality Laws

Update A Game Changing Ruling for the Housing Sector The recent Supreme Court ruling in favor of CG Fry & Son Ltd. marks a significant shift in housing development, especially concerning the controversial nutrient neutrality rules. This decision could catalyze the construction of thousands of homes that had previously been stalled due to regulatory hurdles. The developer had initially received planning permission for a project in Somerset but faced delays due to new environmental guidelines regarding nutrient levels in water systems. Understanding Nutrient Neutrality and Its Challenges Nutrient neutrality aims to prevent development from exacerbating high levels of harmful nutrients, primarily nitrates and phosphates, in sensitive ecosystems. Although well-intentioned, the implementation of these rules has caused significant gridlock in the housing sector. CG Fry's case underscores how changing regulatory landscapes can create uncertainties for developers, making it difficult to navigate complex legal frameworks. Legal Experts Weigh In: Future Implications Experts in construction law are already commenting on the broader implications of this ruling. It not only clears the path for CG Fry's stalled projects but also sets a precedent for future developments. Legal professionals are closely monitoring the aftermath, especially as other developers might seek to leverage this ruling in similar circumstances. However, future legislation, such as the proposed Planning and Infrastructure Bill, could complicate matters again if new regulations are introduced. The Emotional Toll on Developers For many small and medium-sized developers like CG Fry, the emotional and financial strain caused by prolonged legal battles cannot be understated. As highlighted by Philip Fry, the managing director, the costs associated with delays could deter many from entering an already challenging market. This ruling offers a glimmer of hope, but it also serves as a reminder of the turbulent realities of navigating the construction law landscape. What This Means for Future Housing Developments The Supreme Court's ruling is expected to have immediate and significant effects on the planning and approval of housing projects throughout the UK. With developers now potentially able to resume work on projects that faced stagnation, the long-term prospects for housing accessibility could improve. Additionally, local governments and planning bodies will need to reassess their policies in light of this ruling, ensuring that future development aligns with both environmental protections and housing needs. This is a pivotal moment for the construction industry, filled with potential opportunities for growth and a renewed focus on responsible development. As the legal landscape shifts, it is crucial for homeowners, builders, and facility managers alike to stay informed and engaged in conversations around building and construction law.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*